Efficacy of a 0.01% Silver Nitrate Solution Used for Wound Irrigation

SilverStream for Wound Irrigation

Author: Johnson-Arbor K Department of Emergency Medicine and Traumatology Wound Healing and Hyperbaric Medicine Center Hartford Hospital; Hartford, CT

BACKGROUND

  • Normal Saline (NS) is commonly used for irrigation of chronic wounds.
  • Other irrigation solutions are available, but there is limited evidence supporting their clinical effectiveness.
  • We sought to investigate the efficacy of a topical wound irrigation product containing 0.01% silver nitrate solution (SNS).

METHODS

  • The study methodology was approved by the hospital’s IRB.
  • Four adult patients who had venous leg ulcers (VLU) with slough tissue present and who made twice weekly visits to our outpatient wound center (OWC) were enrolled.
  • 3 females, 1 male
  • Average patient age was 59 years old (range 45-79 years old)
  • All ulcers were chronic (average duration of 41 months’ presence (range 9-97 months)
  • At each OWC visit, the VLU was irrigated with 35-50 cc of 0.01% SNS using a 35 cc syringe; then a piece of 0.01% SNS-soaked gauze was applied to the wound for ten minutes.
  • Traditional wound care products (topical antimicrobial agents and compression therapy) were then applied to the VLU as per the treating physician’s order.
  • Outcome measures included total wound area measurements and the amounts of slough and/or granulation tissue present.
  • Patients and OWC staff were also asked to note whether pain or other adverse events occurred.

RESULTS

  • Three of the four patients experienced decreases in total wound area.
  • Wound areas decreased by an average of 47% (range 25.9%-88.5%)
  • All patients enrolled were found to have a subjective increase in granulation tissue and a reduction in the amount of slough tissue in their wounds.
  • The reduction in slough tissue translated into a decreased need for sharp debridements.
  • Subjective reductions in wound odor and periwound erythema were also noted.
  • Wound irrigation with 0.01% SNS was associated with only mild side effects such as pruritis and a mild-to-moderate burning sensation.
  • Argyria was not reported to occur.

DISCUSSION

  • The mechanical debridement effect of the 0.01% SNS-soaked gauze on the wounds may have contributed to the reduction in slough tissue.
  • Several patients reported that the burning sensation associated with the use of 0.01% SNS was minimal compared with the sensations they experienced after use of ¼-strength Dakins’ solution for wound irrigation.

CONCLUSION

  • 0.01% SNS appears to be a reasonable alternative to NS as a wound irrigation agent.
  • The use of 0.01% SNS is associated with a reduction in wound slough tissue and a decreased need for sharp debridement.
  • Adverse events are minimal after use of 0.01% SNS for irrigation of sloughy VLU’s.

⚠ Warning: the content may be hard to watch

Download Case Study